Category Archives: Theme Nine: Efficiency and Effectiveness of Various Pathways to the Ultimate Impacts?
This is the culmination of my 15-month exploration of what we are learning about microfinance and world hunger—not just what Freedom from Hunger is learning from its own research into what works and what doesn’t, but also the research of … Continue reading
I have not offered an expanded Benefits Diagram (as Freedom from Hunger calls its theory of change) since Theme Six, when I completed the discussion of “intermediate outcomes.” Since then, I have explored the evidence pertaining to the business cases … Continue reading
Theme Six of this blog is about better health and nutrition practices and greater use of vital health products and services. The emphasis is on knowledge and practices, not health and nutrition outcomes, because at that point in The Evidence … Continue reading
Theme Four of this blog is about household savings and consumption-smoothing. Post #49, in particular, showed that improvements in consumption-smoothing and ability to manage financial shocks are fairly reliable outcomes of microfinance access. This general conclusion is affirmed, in terms … Continue reading
The standard message from advocates is that savings group programs reach poorer people than do credit-led microfinance institutions (MFIs). In post # 78, I found that MFIs in general don’t do a great job of including the poor. Even the … Continue reading
In the June 2009 issue of Enterprise Development and Microfinance, I summarized Freedom from Hunger’s experience with village banking offered by credit unions and rural banks. Here I excerpt the section titled “Poverty status of clients.” For most of the … Continue reading
In Theme Three, I found that the more credible impact studies of access to microfinance had uncovered little statistically significant positive impact on household income and consumption. This general conclusion is affirmed by the just-released results of the impact study … Continue reading